Project Stage
Site Acquisition
Acquisition is where basis is set forever; the financing has to deliver certainty on the seller's calendar without borrowing against entitlements that do not exist yet.
- The stage
- From executed contract through closing, with control, diligence, and funding on the seller's calendar
- Common structures
- Bridge acquisition loans, land facilities, seller financing, and acquisition-development-construction structures where plans are advanced
- Program parameters
- Confirmed during project review; land leverage runs conservative and varies with entitlement status and exit clarity
Who this serves
- Developers under contract on entitled or unentitled development sites
- Sponsors facing closing deadlines ahead of their permanent capital plan
- Builders assembling infill sites or replacement lots
- Buyers negotiating seller financing as part of the land purchase
When it fits
- A site is under contract with a real closing calendar
- The intended project and rough budget already exist, even in draft
- The basis works under conservative entitlement assumptions
- Equity is committed for the share land loans do not reach
Every development project makes its most permanent decision first: what was paid for the land. Budgets get value-engineered and exits get repriced, but basis is forever. Site acquisition sets that number, usually under a seller's deadline with diligence incomplete; the financing's job is certainty on that calendar without urgency writing checks the project cannot cash.
Most acquisition files here run between $3 million and $7 million, one of our core transaction ranges, from infill lots to community-scale positions.
What defines this stage
The project exists on paper and in a purchase contract, sometimes with entitlements, sometimes nothing but zoning and intent. Income is zero, carry begins at closing, and the currencies are speed and certainty: a seller prices the probability of your closing as much as the number on it. The stage ends at title transfer; everything after belongs to entitlements and predevelopment.
The capital questions at this stage
How much leverage can land carry, sized conservatively because land produces nothing while it waits, with entitlement status moving the answer. What closes fastest without skipping the diligence protecting the basis; title, survey, environmental, and feasibility are compressible, not skippable. Whether the seller is part of the stack: a carryback can bridge gaps, subject to senior consent and honest subordination. And whether the acquisition is financed alone or as the first phase of a continuous plan.
Programs that fit this stage
Bridge acquisition financing serves the classic case: real deadline, sound site, permanent plans still forming. Land and predevelopment financing fits where the hold through entitlements is the plan, funding acquisition and the soft costs after it. Where plans, budget, and team are advanced, acquisition, development, and construction financing carries the project from closing through vertical work: fewer closings, fewer gaps, more diligence up front.
What to prepare before entitlements and predevelopment
Leave this stage with more than a deed: a written entitlement strategy (approvals, sequence, political realities), consultants identified, a predevelopment budget with honest carry, and a first-draft capital plan. Sponsors who close with that package move through the next stage on schedule; those who close with only enthusiasm fund the difference in carry.
Where files get difficult at this stage
The failure patterns are old ones. Unentitled land priced as if approvals were certain, so the basis needs a perfect outcome. Diligence compressed past protection; the environmental surprise found after closing costs multiples of the report. Closing calendars that force capital decisions before the capital plan exists.
And equity so committed to the land that nothing remains for the entitlement years. Each is avoidable with the same discipline: buy the site the numbers support, not the one the deadline demands.
Frequently asked questions
How much can I borrow against unentitled land?
Less than against entitled land, and the specific proportion is confirmed during project review; capital sources size land loans conservatively because the collateral produces nothing while it waits. The stronger the entitlement story and the exit math, the harder the structure can work.
Can seller financing sit behind an acquisition loan?
Sometimes, and it can bridge a real gap in the stack, but the senior lender must approve it, and subordination terms decide whether it helps or complicates. Raise it in the first conversation, not after the senior terms are set.
Should I close with cash and finance the land afterward?
It is a legitimate tactic when the discount for speed is real; certainty wins negotiations. The risk is the refinance assumption; capital markets move, and a post-closing land loan is never promised. Sponsors who close cash should do it with a financing read in hand, not on faith.
What if my closing deadline is sooner than any reasonable diligence period?
That is what bridge structures exist for, but they do not suspend judgment; title, survey, environmental, and basic feasibility still have to clear, quickly. A deadline explains urgency; it does not repair a site problem. An honest early read on the site is worth more than speed applied to a mistake.
Related resources
Financing
Bridge Acquisition Financing
Bridge financing for acquisitions and transitions, when the timeline is fixed, the asset is between stages, and the permanent answer comes later.
Financing
Land & Predevelopment Financing
Acquisition and predevelopment financing for residential land, structured honestly around entitlement risk, carry, and the path to a construction start.
Financing
Acquisition, Development & Construction Financing
AD&C financing for residential developers, with land acquisition, horizontal development, and vertical construction structured as one plan with clearly sequenced stages.
Solution
Closing a Capital Stack Gap
A capital stack gap has a size, a location, and a clock. Naming all three precisely is what determines whether mezzanine, preferred equity, or more sponsor capital closes it.
Calculator
Loan-to-Value Calculator
Measure your loan request against value (as-is, as-completed, or as-stabilized), the companion test to loan-to-cost in every development file.
Financing
Luxury Residential Development Financing
Business-purpose financing for luxury for-sale residential development: spec estates, high-end infill, resort-market projects, and boutique condominiums and townhomes.
Reviewed by Eddie Luhrassebi, Founder & CEO · CA DRE #01230650 · NMLS #337071 · Last updated July 21, 2026
Nothing on this page is a commitment to lend, a rate or term quote, or an approval. Any financing described is subject to full underwriting, third-party reports, documentation, and approval by the applicable capital source. Submitting a project review request does not create a commitment of any kind.
Financing structures described on this page may not be available for every project, sponsor, location, or point in time. Availability depends on project feasibility, sponsorship, market conditions, and the requirements of participating capital sources. State availability may vary.
